Cover of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) for Packaging: Design and Implementation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Plastic pollution is rising fastest where waste systems are weakest. A new discussion paper from The Consumer Goods Forum’s Plastic Waste Coalition sets out practical steps to help low- and middle-income countries build fairer, more effective systems for managing packaging waste.

Plastic pollution is one of the most visible environmental challenges of our time. In many low- and middle-income countries, packaging makes up a large share of the waste found on streets, in rivers, and across communities yet local authorities often lack the infrastructure or resources to manage it effectively. 

To help address this challenge, the Consumer Goods Forum (CGF) Plastic Waste Coalition of Action has launched a new discussion paper, Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) for Packaging: Design and Implementation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Building on The CGF’s 2022 Principles for Optimal EPR Design, the paper provides practical guidance for policymakers, businesses, and waste management stakeholders on how to create effective EPR systems in contexts where solid waste infrastructure is limited and the informal sector plays a vital role. 

Explore the paper

The guidance sets out six essential design and implementation elements, with particular focus on three priority areas: 

  • Institutions: Recommending a professional, not-for-profit centralised institution governed by producers and responsible for implementing and governing the EPR system. If an alternative model is chosen, ensure all core functions are fulfilled by these institution(s).
  • Infrastructure: Encouraging EPR systems that attract public and private investment to address critical waste management gaps and guarantee long-term service revenue and contracts.
  • Integration of the informal sector: Providing practical principles to ensure participation of informal waste workers in EPR governance, fair compensation for their service, and facilitation of contracting with waste pickers organisations. 

The paper highlights that while EPR can be a game-changer for packaging waste, it is not a silver bullet. It must be implemented alongside broader investments in waste management systems and supported by coherent policies that promote reduction, reuse, and recycling. 

Developed with input from CGF members, the Fair Circularity Initiative (FCI), and local experts, the paper was coordinated by Systemiq as secretariat of the Plastic Waste Coalition. The CGF hopes this guidance will spark continued dialogue and collaboration, helping to accelerate progress toward a circular economy for plastics worldwide.  

“EPR schemes have proven to be a powerful tool in advancing circularity in packaging, but their success in LMICs hinges on inclusive, well-funded, and context-aware design. This guidance is the result of deep collaboration between industry leaders, local experts, and partners such as the Fair Circularity Initiative, and we hope it will help create EPR systems that are both effective and equitable.”

Cédric DeverDirector, Plastic Waste at The Consumer Goods Forum

“Well-designed EPR systems can be an effective way to boost recycling and drive infrastructure investment. We recognize that one size does not fit all. This guidance aims to accelerate EPR in markets with diverse waste management conditions, including those where waste pickers play a critical role. PepsiCo is proud to have contributed to this work and aims to help shape inclusive EPR programs that can deliver positive environmental outcomes and help livelihoods at scale.”

Anke BoykinSenior Director, Global Environmental Policy, PepsiCo

"At Systemiq, we are proud to have supported the CGF Plastic Waste Coalition of Action in shaping this paper. Low- and middle-income countries face distinct challenges and opportunities in designing and implementing Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) schemes – from limited waste systems to the role of the informal sector. This guidance offers practical, adaptable recommendations to help governments and businesses design effective EPR frameworks tailored to local realities, while also laying a foundation for greater harmonisation."

Marloes van der MeerDirector at Systemiq

“Waste pickers are the backbone of recycling systems, yet too often they face discrimination, unsafe conditions, and exclusion from basic rights. EPR schemes must respect their human rights by ensuring recognition, fair pay, and inclusion in decision-making. When waste pickers are integrated, waste is collected more effectively. When they are excluded, their livelihoods and rights are put at risk. Inclusive EPR is essential for both effectiveness and fairness.”

Nicolas RonderosAssociate Director, Collaborative Initiatives, BSR and The Fair Circularity Initiative
 
Divider

Sign up for systemiq updates

News about our projects and insights from our experts.