Literature Review on System Change

Insights from different traditions, disciplines and theorists on system change

Published 2nd December 2025

This literature review synthesises key insights from different traditions, disciplines and theorists, highlighting aspects most relevant for system change today

Download report [PDF]

Why is it so hard to meaningfully change an economic system, even when that system isn’t serving the common good? And even when there are viable alternatives and strategies for change? Too often, well-crafted plans falter when confronted with the real-world complexity and entrenched interests of our most important economic systems. The Blue Whale Inquiry set out to understand why – and how to do better. As part of this we are learning from, and building on, the work of the many theorists and traditions that have grappled with similar questions: What are systems? What causes them to shift or to remain locked-in? And what kind of leadership does this require?

This literature review synthesises key insights from more than 20 theorists, highlighting aspects most relevant for system change today. Specifically for accelerating the transition to cleaner, fairer, and more prosperous economies. These insights include how systems are structured, how they evolve, the pace at which different elements shift, and how patterns of feedback, behaviour, and mindset reinforce or disrupt existing dynamics.

Our review draws on diverse traditions and disciplines – including Confucian, Buddhist and Indigenous worldviews, alongside mid-20th-century Western foundational thinkers, complexity theorists and contemporary thinkers. Together, these perspectives offer distinct yet complementary views on how systems behave and what it takes to transform them.

We conclude by introducing Systemiq’s Approach to System Change – Inspire, Overtake, Lead – a practical framework designed to empower changemakers at Systemiq and beyond. We situate this framework in the context of recent tools that have been developed to bridge from theory to action. Our framework is informed by the literature and the broader work of the Blue Whale Inquiry, including practitioner interviews, in-depth case studies, and practical insights drawn from Systemiq’s experience and that of our partners and broader community over the past decade.

We hope that this literature review will serve as a practical touchpoint for changemakers at Systemiq and beyond. It is both humbling and empowering to learn from the thinkers and traditions that have long sought to unravel the mysteries of system change. Understanding the divergences between their views, and the influence of their contexts on their thinking, reminds us that we too are shaped by the assumptions and circumstances of our time. Equally, seeing where they converge, sometimes across great distances in time and space, helps light our own path. There are no “right answers” to system change. But there are enduring features which prove important again and again. The role of participation. The nature of leadership. The relationship between top-down and bottom-up approaches to change.

By surfacing these and by understanding contemporary and historic approaches to system change, we can be much more deliberate in our approach, with a real focus on action. It is in this spirit – and with gratitude to the theorists, traditions and practitioners we have drawn upon – that we offer this review.

Download report [PDF]
RESOURCES

AUTHORS

Astrid von Preussen
Senior Associate

Diane Vu
Project Manager

Zena Creed
Engagement director

In the Blue Whale Inquiry series…

Shock Therapy

A strategic reset for the sustainability movement

Lessons from the Field

How to change systems – from those who’ve done it

Holding the Tension

Reflections from NYCW 2025

Literature Review on System Change

Insights from different traditions, disciplines and theorists on system change

Sign up for Systemiq updates

News about our projects and insights from our experts.

Cover artwork includes AI-generated sketches, some derived from Creative Commons–licensed images. Full image credits

Person / Concept Info Image Credit & License
Deganawida (symbol: Eastern White Pine) Sketch inspired by an Eastern White Pine, a symbol of the Haudenosaunee “Tree of Peace”. Sketch derived from original photograph by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (public domain).
Tyson Yunkaporta (symbolic) TBC TBC
Robin Wall Kimmerer Sketch derived from a photograph of Robin Wall Kimmerer. Image of Robin Wall Kimmerer © John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation–used with permission. CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Joseph Schumpeter Sketch derived from a 1945 portrait of Joseph Schumpeter. Image via Wikimedia Commons, public domain.
Hyman Minsky Sketch derived from a photograph of Hyman Minsky. Image via Wikimedia Commons, public domain.
Rudi Dornbusch Sketch derived from a photograph of Rudi Dornbusch. Photo via Wikimedia Commons, Universitätsarchiv St.Gallen | Regina Kühne | HSGH 022/000754/04 | CC-BY-SA 4.0
Thomas Schelling Photo via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 2.0
Ludwig von Bertalanffy Sketch derived from a portrait of Ludwig von Bertalanffy (1926). Image via Wikimedia Commons, public domain.
Donella Meadows TBC TBC
W. Brian Arthur Sketch derived from a photograph of W. Brian Arthur. Photo by World Economic Forum, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
Stuart Kauffman Sketch derived from a photograph of Stuart Kauffman. Photo via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0.”
Otto Scharmer Sketch derived from a photograph of Otto Scharmer. Photo via Wikimedia Commons, CC-BY-SA 4.0
Matthieu Ricard Sketch derived from a photograph of Matthieu Ricard. CC BY-SA 3.0. Credit: “Photo via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0.”
Daniel Goleman Sketch derived from a photograph of Daniel Goleman. CC BY-SA 2.0 (WEF). Credit: “Photo by World Economic Forum, CC BY-SA 2.0.”
Ken Wilber Sketch derived from a photograph of Ken Wilber. CC BY-SA 3.0. Credit: “Photo via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0.”
Wangari Maathai Sketch derived from a photograph of Wangari Maathai. CC BY-SA 2.0. Credit: “Photo via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 2.0.”
Elinor Ostrom Sketch derived from a photograph of Elinor Ostrom. CC BY-SA 3.0. Credit: “Photo via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0.”
David Snowden Sketch derived from a photograph of Dave Snowden. CC BY-SA 4.0. Credit: “Photo via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0.”
Mariana Mazzucato Sketch derived from a photograph of Mariana Mazzucato. CC BY 3.0. Credit: “Photo by David Monniaux, CC BY 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons.”
Ha-Joon Chang Sketch derived from a photograph of Ha-Joon Chang. CC BY-SA 4.0. Credit: “Photo via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0.”
Thomas Kuhn Sketch derived from a photograph of Thomas Kuhn. Likely CC BY-SA 3.0 or Public Domain. Use file-page license. Caption: “Image via Wikimedia Commons, [license].”
Naomi Oreskes Sketch derived from a photograph of Naomi Oreskes. CC BY-SA 3.0. Credit: “Photo via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0.”
James Lovelock Sketch derived from a photograph of James Lovelock. CC BY-SA 3.0 + personality-rights notice. Credit: “Photo via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0.”
Fritjof Capra Sketch derived from a photograph of Fritjof Capra. CC BY-SA 3.0. Credit: “Photo via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0.”
Friedrich Hayek Sketch derived from a photograph of Friedrich Hayek. Likely Public Domain or CC BY-SA. Use license from file page.
Carlota Perez Sketch derived from a photograph of Carlota Perez. CC BY-SA 4.0. Credit: “Photo via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0.”
Bruce Ackerman Sketch derived from a photograph of Bruce Ackerman. CC BY-SA 4.0. Credit: “Photo via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0.”
Marshall McLuhan Sketch derived from a photograph of Marshall McLuhan. Typically Public Domain (1967 press photo).